Question

For centuries, millets such as ragi, jowar and bajra were staple foods across the drier parts of India. They grow on poor soil, need far less water than rice and can survive long gaps between rains. From the 1960s onwards, however, government procurement and subsidised distribution focused heavily on rice and wheat, and millets slowly came to be seen as coarse food eaten only by the poor. Many farmers who once grew them switched to crops that the state would buy at a guaranteed price. In recent years, interest in millets has returned. Nutritionists point out that they are rich in fibre and minerals and that they raise blood sugar more slowly than polished rice. Climate scientists value them for a different reason: as rainfall becomes less predictable, a crop that tolerates drought is a form of insurance. Yet enthusiasm in city supermarkets has not automatically reached the fields. Millets are harder to process than wheat, and many small farmers still have no mill nearby. Unless procurement, processing and demand grow together, experts warn, the revival may remain a fashion among urban shoppers rather than a change in what farmers choose to plant. What is the main concern expressed in the last part of the passage?

Accepted Answer

Urban demand alone may not change what farmers actually plant

Answer

Farmers are growing more millets than cities can consume

Answer

Supermarkets are selling millets of poor quality

Answer

Millets will soon become too expensive for the poor

What is the main concern expressed in the last part of the passage?

Practise reading comprehension

More reading comprehension questions

More verbal ability practice